I've not previously been accused of being dense, fragile or a prig. Insufferable - on occasion - so I'll have to take that one.canyncarvr wrote:Well, johnny boy...I'm sorry you're too dense to understand basic English..let alone a further explanation of what was simple enough to understand in the first place.
If you think anything said had anything to do with belittling, then the fragile sense of your own self you evidently have is not capable of withstanding the light of day, let alone anything said with such intent.
Heavens to Murgetroyd. Can you possibly be that frail and insufferable? Indeed, such a prig?
So, please expound oh righteous one: Exactly what is the correct answer to the question regarding performance gains resulting from a piston swap? Please do be specific.
Nothing about the question possibly gives rise to any uncertainty! Of course that cannot be so....THAT (giving rise to uncertainty) being a definition, moron, of 'dubious'.
...the meaning of the word having absolutely nothing to do with your attempted use of it.
No soup for you!
Righteous - that's a term used by guilty people who don't like thinking of themselves as such.
The first definition of dubious in my book is "fraught with uncertainty". The only thing even remotely dubious here is your - uh, ... orientation.
Not that there's anything wrong with that...
