Silencer vs Spark arrester

Got questions? We got answers....
Post Reply
svtman79
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 09:57 pm Oct 19 2009
Country:
Location: louisiana

Silencer vs Spark arrester

Post by svtman79 »

What is the main difference between a silencer and a spark arrester? Is there any advantage to one or the other? Where I ride I don't think any laws are enforced. The bike in question is a 99 KDX220 soon to be with a Pro Circuit pipe.
Ryan Z
1999 KDX220
FMF Gnarly Desert
Boyesen 607's
Air Box Mod with No Toil Filter
12 tooth front sprocket
Jimmy Button Bars
Tusk Bark Busters
.42 kg Racetech springs
Maier MX fender
KarlP
Supporting Member III
Supporting Member III
Posts: 1484
Joined: 02:26 pm Jun 29 2005
Country:
Location: Alabama

Post by KarlP »

The main differenc is a screen or baffle placed in the exhaust path that is meant to keep glowing embers of carbon from leaving the pipe and setting the woods on fire. IMO, I think this is an extremely unlikely event on 2-strokes and really unlikely on the KDX. The exhaust is just too cold.

It doesn't matter what anyone thinks if you go to a riding area that requires a SA on all bikes and you don't have one. I'm not aware of any advantage of one over the other. The race series I go to now and then requires them, so I got one, but I have noticed that when we are all lined up in the woods the race official guy with the piece of coat hanger wire is only looking at the 4-strokes.

Performance wise you won't gain a much over the stock SA, except weight loss.
'08 KTM200xc
'99 CR/KDX Hybrid with that RB stuff done to it
KX100 for the boy
svtman79
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 09:57 pm Oct 19 2009
Country:
Location: louisiana

Post by svtman79 »

Yeah I was not sure the actual difference in the two. I was planning on buying a type 296 spark arrester.
Ryan Z
1999 KDX220
FMF Gnarly Desert
Boyesen 607's
Air Box Mod with No Toil Filter
12 tooth front sprocket
Jimmy Button Bars
Tusk Bark Busters
.42 kg Racetech springs
Maier MX fender
gregp
Member
Posts: 498
Joined: 03:44 pm Jul 30 2009
Country:

Post by gregp »

Silencers with spark arrestors are generally a little bit longer than just a silencer. I had an FMF silencer/spark arrestor on my '96 KDX, and I cut the spark arrestor off for a "shorty" style silencer. Noise levels did not increase at all, from what I could tell, but the power felt like it hit a little sooner and had a slightly healthier mid range (which was what I was after at the time).
Spark arrestors are generally required in any state or federal forests, though (they keep flames from shooting uncontrollably out of your pipe)
:roll:
2004 Dual Sported KDX200
1999 Ninja 250 (Daughter's)
1996 DR 650 (stock, mostly street use)
User avatar
Indawoods
Creator and Founder
Creator and Founder
Posts: 9951
Joined: 09:59 am Jun 12 2003
Country:
Location: Midwest

Post by Indawoods »

If you ride woods.... you should always have a Spark Arrestor on your bike period.

If you cause a fire by thinking it is stupid to ride without a spark arrested exhaust.... you not only lose yet another riding area for yourself and others but could cause human and animal loss.
*** Administrator //***
****'95 KDX 200/****

"People ate cows a thousand years ago for the same reason we eat them now. Cause they are easy to catch.We're not savages,we're just lazy. A cheetah could taste like chocolate heroin. But will never know. Those bastards are fast!!! "
User avatar
Mr. Wibbens
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 4884
Joined: 02:57 am Nov 07 2004
Country:
Location: Playing in the Poison Oak
Contact:

Post by Mr. Wibbens »

And if you get caught, you can be charged the bill for fighting that fire
Warning! This member tends to use sarcasm as a regular form of communication. If a post seems offensive, before you panic and fly off the handle, re-read the post and imagine it being said with a sideways grin.
((Bike Profile))
((Pics))
FIVE OUT OF FOUR PEOPLE DONUT UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
User avatar
bcdonyo
Supporting Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 07:31 pm Nov 26 2008
Country:
Location: So. Nv.

Post by bcdonyo »

>|<>QBB<
KarlP wrote:The main differenc is a screen or baffle placed in the exhaust path that is meant to keep glowing embers of carbon from leaving the pipe and setting the woods on fire. IMO, I think this is an extremely unlikely event on 2-strokes and really unlikely on the KDX. The exhaust is just too cold.

It doesn't matter what anyone thinks if you go to a riding area that requires a SA on all bikes and you don't have one. I'm not aware of any advantage of one over the other. The race series I go to now and then requires them, so I got one, but I have noticed that when we are all lined up in the woods the race official guy with the piece of coat hanger wire is only looking at the 4-strokes.

Performance wise you won't gain a much over the stock SA, except weight loss.
+1, I think the odds of a properly running, non arrested two cycle starting a fire are pretty nil. But, the law is the law, and they only weigh slightly more and lower perfomance marginally, so I always run them.

I once got a verbal warning from a ranger/BLM guy at Dumont dunes for not having spark arrestors on my Banshee. He got pissed when I asked him about the fire hazard in SAND DUNES. :roll:

Then when I pointed out that virtually none of the sand cars and gas golf carts running around had them, he said it didn't matter, the law only applies to bikes and atvs.

I ride in the desert mostly, no fire hazard. I like to run a SA though because I do occasionally ride in areas that require them. It's better to just run one so you dial in your in jetting and do not have to change it if you choose to ride in an area where they're required.
Last edited by bcdonyo on 01:44 pm Nov 24 2009, edited 1 time in total.
IdahoCharley
Supporting Member II
Supporting Member II
Posts: 1005
Joined: 06:57 pm Mar 19 2005
Country:

Post by IdahoCharley »

..."I ride in the desert mostly, no fire hazard"

Nevade desert doesn't have wild fires? Sage brush and wild grass fires spread fast.
KTM 380EXC Mine
KDX 200 Mark's
TTR 125 L Wife's
KDX 200 Austin's
EC 300 Tyson's
WR430 Husky - mine
User avatar
canyncarvr
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 6943
Joined: 01:07 pm Nov 05 2004
Country: US
Location: The Mythical State of Jefferson

Post by canyncarvr »

I've seen far more sparks come off foot pegs, toe clips, and chains than I have exhaust. The former don't carry much heat at all...the latter would.

Probably mostly due to their intended application, silencers always seem louder to me than a S/A. That's reason enough to choose an arrester, seems to me.

Dipped-chits that think loud is somehow impressive (not to mention their bikes are surely at least 10HP better'n anyone elses S/A'd bike!!) are morons.

To be a real man..you have to run your FmF shorty silencer at least a dozen times up and down the staging area (preferably with either the back tire spitting dust and gravel OR riding a wheelie) before you take off to pollute the rest of the woods on your day-long 10-mile trail ride.

If you happen to be a female rider...you're aspiring to be the same thing. No different.

Consider the source
Using a perceived level of knowledge to boost my self worth.
Non impediti ratione cogitationis

bike profile: !clicky!
User avatar
Varmint
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 823
Joined: 01:33 pm Oct 27 2008
Country:
Location: Bristol, Connecticut
Contact:

Post by Varmint »

>|<>QBB<
canyncarvr wrote:I've seen far more sparks come off foot pegs, toe clips, and chains than I have exhaust. The former don't carry much heat at all...the latter would.

Probably mostly due to their intended application, silencers always seem louder to me than a S/A. That's reason enough to choose an arrester, seems to me.

Dipped-chits that think loud is somehow impressive (not to mention their bikes are surely at least 10HP better'n anyone elses S/A'd bike!!) are morons.

To be a real man..you have to run your FmF shorty silencer at least a dozen times up and down the staging area (preferably with either the back tire spitting dust and gravel OR riding a wheelie) before you take off to pollute the rest of the woods on your day-long 10-mile trail ride.

If you happen to be a female rider...you're aspiring to be the same thing. No different.
I want to throw a cro-bar into the front rim of those guys! They rip through the parking lot, chucking rocks at everyone's trucks. Dumb@sses! The trail head is right there!!!! Get in an ride yourself into a tree. Do I sound angry? :evil:

Even worse is when they let their kids do it too. Running laps. Drives me nuts. I step out in front of them and tell them to C.T.S!
In my garage
2003 KDX200
2003 KX85
2005 CRF230F
2009 300 XC-W(e)
My KDX
User avatar
bcdonyo
Supporting Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 07:31 pm Nov 26 2008
Country:
Location: So. Nv.

Post by bcdonyo »

>|QBB<[/url]
IdahoCharley wrote:Nevade desert doesn't have wild fires? Sage brush and wild grass fires spread fast.
Man, thanks for taking my post out of context. :roll: Did you read the whole post? My sister owns a cattle ranch up North, so I'm well aware of fire hazards in NV.

For your benifit I guess I should have said WHERE I RIDE there isn't a fire hazard.

I've only heard of one "wild fire" near me in the 13 years I've lived here and it was at the sewer ponds in East Vegas, where I've never ridden.

This is about the most dense the vegitation gets where I ride:
Image

There are some places where you don't need a SA:
Image

And some of those places still stupidly require you to have them. Where's the fire hazard here?
Image
User avatar
Indawoods
Creator and Founder
Creator and Founder
Posts: 9951
Joined: 09:59 am Jun 12 2003
Country:
Location: Midwest

Post by Indawoods »

Well... I don't like swapping out a SA and silencer... I will just stick with the SA... safe everywhere..... :wink:
*** Administrator //***
****'95 KDX 200/****

"People ate cows a thousand years ago for the same reason we eat them now. Cause they are easy to catch.We're not savages,we're just lazy. A cheetah could taste like chocolate heroin. But will never know. Those bastards are fast!!! "
User avatar
bcdonyo
Supporting Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 07:31 pm Nov 26 2008
Country:
Location: So. Nv.

Post by bcdonyo »

>|<>QBB<
bcdonyo wrote:But, the law is the law, and they only weigh slightly more and lower perfomance marginally, so I always run them.

It's better to just run one so you dial in your in jetting and do not have to change it if you choose to ride in an area where they're required.
Pretty much my sentiments exactly! Just run one.
User avatar
canyncarvr
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 6943
Joined: 01:07 pm Nov 05 2004
Country: US
Location: The Mythical State of Jefferson

Post by canyncarvr »

I recall the question: 'Does that place glow in the dark?'

:hmm:

I don't recall the answer.


Looks like a good place for Arpaio to rent from you Silver State folks to use as a felonial residence.

Consider the source
Using a perceived level of knowledge to boost my self worth.
Non impediti ratione cogitationis

bike profile: !clicky!
User avatar
bcdonyo
Supporting Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 07:31 pm Nov 26 2008
Country:
Location: So. Nv.

Post by bcdonyo »

Due to the close proximity to Vegas, yes it does glow in the dark.

If Arpaio ran for office out here, I'd vote for him! We could have stored violent fellons with the glow in the dark waste at Yucca Mountain, but Obama and Reid put the kabash on that posible doulbe whammy.
motorhed220
Member
Posts: 215
Joined: 04:23 pm Dec 30 2005
Country:
Location: Hamilton Ontario

Post by motorhed220 »

IMO...keep it loud N Proud!!!!!! But as far as spark Arestors are concerned,ive seen more sparks off my own boots on pavement, harleys running WAY to lean and my old 1980's XT 250 with no Muffler at all in the bush (true story and it was a chaore to get the B*tCH home) anyhow if your in the desert and by way i saw your pix, its looks AMAZING!!!!! You should be fine... Geta loud pipe so long as it dont annoy anyone and ROCK ON!!!!
Live to Ride, Ride to live!!!
Post Reply