Page 1 of 1

Issues with Headlight removed?

Posted: 12:07 pm Aug 14 2009
by Varmint
I did the fork conversion the other day and left the headlight off. I removed the light switch, headlight harness, put the ground back, made sure the kill switch was connected, taped off the two headlight connections and now the bike wont start. :hmm: Pops like there's spark but ends quickly with a deep bog.

Does the light switch still need to be in the circuit for it to fire?

FYI, I have the mx rear fender so no taillight either.

2003 kdx 200

Thank you.

Any spelling errors? :grin:

Posted: 03:20 pm Aug 14 2009
by KarlP
I did the same on mine. No problems.

Could you have pulled another connector loose while working on the harness?

O,h, no speling errs, gud grammr

Hukt on phonix wurkt fur mi :wink:

Posted: 07:39 am Aug 17 2009
by Varmint
Hmmm, rechecked all the connections and she fired up. Just one-a-doze "walk away and give it another try later" deals.

Posted: 11:45 am Aug 17 2009
by canyncarvr
Re: 'Does the light switch still need to be in the circuit for it to fire?'

No. Separate circuits. Nothing shared except ground.


Re: 'I removed the light switch, headlight harness, put the ground back, made sure the kill switch was connected, taped off the two headlight connections and now .....'

Not spelling, but grammar.

When using commas to separate items in a list, a comma is placed before the conjuntive 'and', too.

.., taped off, and now...

That being the 'Oxford' comma or 'serial comma' way of looking at it.

Unless...it's not your way of looking at it. :shock:

Yes, some think there is no reason for a comma in such a listing, but that may lead to:

'I wish to thank my parents, Franz and Hanz.'


Personally, I'd prefer to thank my parents, Franz, and Hanz.

But, that's probably just me. :wink:

Posted: 12:12 am Aug 18 2009
by Mr. Wibbens
Your parents names are Franz and Hanz?

Posted: 12:27 am Aug 18 2009
by canyncarvr
No.

Read the '..may lead to...'

Hence, and thusly, the comma.

Posted: 10:03 am Aug 18 2009
by MXOldtimer
:lol:

Posted: 10:13 am Aug 18 2009
by kawagumby
thusly :mrgreen:

Posted: 11:44 am Aug 18 2009
by tbirdsp
canyncarvr wrote: conjuntive
You mean "conjunctive" :twisted:

Posted: 11:54 am Aug 18 2009
by canyncarvr
>|<>QBB<
tbirdsp wrote:
canyncarvr wrote: conjuntive
You mean "conjunctive" :twisted:
:hmm:

Really? I do? Err....I did? No kidding? Are you joshin' me?

Naw!! Wow. Amazing. Learn a new word every day!!

Isn't that just great!? ...that you figgered that out, even.

I'm impressed. Yessirree Bob! :prayer: