Want a total woods weapon for under 3k. Ideas?

Got questions? We got answers....
firffighter
Supporting Member
Posts: 513
Joined: 03:39 pm Apr 18 2006
Country:
Location: Boring, Oregon

Want a total woods weapon for under 3k. Ideas?

Post by firffighter »

I am looking to put a bike together that will conquer the tough Oregon terrain. It has to be light because of the tight technical stuff, have low end to chug up nasty, slick, steep, rooty, rocky hills, and be easy to start if you stall or tip over (never personally has happened to me :wink: ). I would like a bike that can handle the nasty stuff, putt with the kids, and take me through a couple of harescrambles and GP's.

My thought is a used KDX220 which you can pick up a nice one around here for around 2k. 1st make sure the suspension is set up for weight/ability $200-$300 (if you stay with stock forks). Next pipe $230. 3rd is RB carb mod $200. Then either a autoclutch and you would have to be done, or go with a Flywheel weight $100, trials tire $100, reeds $125, and assorted bike protection.

I think you would have a pretty nice bike and with an autoclutch or FWW you could get through the tuff stuff and conquer the hills with ease.

Any thoughts? Anyone have a similar setup?
User avatar
Indawoods
Creator and Founder
Creator and Founder
Posts: 9951
Joined: 09:59 am Jun 12 2003
Country:
Location: Midwest

Post by Indawoods »

Yes... a KDX is a wonderful choice. Opt for some KX forks from the get go.... don't bother revalving stock KDX forks... add a Scotts stabilizer in there too.
*** Administrator //***
****'95 KDX 200/****

"People ate cows a thousand years ago for the same reason we eat them now. Cause they are easy to catch.We're not savages,we're just lazy. A cheetah could taste like chocolate heroin. But will never know. Those bastards are fast!!! "
User avatar
Mr. Wibbens
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 4884
Joined: 02:57 am Nov 07 2004
Country:
Location: Playing in the Poison Oak
Contact:

Post by Mr. Wibbens »

Don't overlook the 200, it'll do it too!

I have under $3,000 in mine http://www.kdxrider.net/forums/viewtopi ... 0858#10858

I weigh around 270 nekkid and my lil 200 takes me just about anywhere I want to go around here (S.W. Oregon)
Warning! This member tends to use sarcasm as a regular form of communication. If a post seems offensive, before you panic and fly off the handle, re-read the post and imagine it being said with a sideways grin.
((Bike Profile))
((Pics))
FIVE OUT OF FOUR PEOPLE DONUT UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
KarlP
Supporting Member III
Supporting Member III
Posts: 1484
Joined: 02:26 pm Jun 29 2005
Country:
Location: Alabama

Post by KarlP »

Just me, but if I started from scratch I'd go in this order:
KDX220
Open airbox, Jetting
Guards and barkbusters
KX forks
Revalve rear
RB head

Phase two might be pipe and RB carb. I have found there is a lot more room for performance improvement in the chassis than the motor.

Starting with the best condition used bike, of course.
'08 KTM200xc
'99 CR/KDX Hybrid with that RB stuff done to it
KX100 for the boy
User avatar
80elkster
Supporting Member II
Supporting Member II
Posts: 135
Joined: 08:43 pm Jan 01 2006
Country:
Location: Maple Valley WA

Post by 80elkster »

There is always about a 1/2 dozen KDXs for sale on Craigslist at least up here in Seattle area. Most of which allready have modifiations i.e. pipe, bark busters. I would go with the KX fork swap and steering stabilizer, RB head (if it is a 220), RB carb mod, Boyesen reeds. If your tryin to stay under $3K an auto clutch might put you over that. Guess it all depends on the going in price of the bike???
06 DR650 Farkled
91 WR250 2T
00 300EXC (Sold)
79 XS850 (Sold)
79 CR250 (Sold)
78 IT400 (Stolen)
75 G5 100 Kawi (Gave it away)
73 F7 175 Kawi (Sold)
70 175 Brigestone (Recycled)
05 KDX200(Son's)
93 KDX200
75 KT250 Trials
250 Quads
Just glad to be ridin!
User avatar
kawagumby
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 927
Joined: 10:09 am Nov 30 2006
Country:
Location: California

Post by kawagumby »

Putting on USD forks was my first priority - the stock forks are the only major drawback of this machine, IMO. I too had modified stock forks, i.e., gold valves, springs, etc... and they still stunk.
1994 KDX200, Beta 200rr, yz125, yz250, kx100 modded for adult, gasgas contact 250.
firffighter
Supporting Member
Posts: 513
Joined: 03:39 pm Apr 18 2006
Country:
Location: Boring, Oregon

Post by firffighter »

I would like to start with a 220 because of the low end. If I could find one with pipe/silencer, barkbusters, etc. already on it for around 2k, that would be a nice start. With airbox lid removed, reeds, carb and head mod, I would be around $2300. I want a autoclutch becuase of the steep terrain I like to ride $500. I had a '92 KDX200 and didnt mind the conventional forks after stiffer springs, so I would stick with the forks and add a new stiffer rear spring $200. So, that is around the 3k mark. If I could find a decent KDX for around $1500 then I would add a WER and now you've got a 3k bike that will tackle anything. BTW a trials tire for $100 would be added somewhere in the mix.
'
User avatar
Mr. Wibbens
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 4884
Joined: 02:57 am Nov 07 2004
Country:
Location: Playing in the Poison Oak
Contact:

Post by Mr. Wibbens »

Whats with the trials tire?

That'd be about worthless down here :wink:
Warning! This member tends to use sarcasm as a regular form of communication. If a post seems offensive, before you panic and fly off the handle, re-read the post and imagine it being said with a sideways grin.
((Bike Profile))
((Pics))
FIVE OUT OF FOUR PEOPLE DONUT UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
firffighter
Supporting Member
Posts: 513
Joined: 03:39 pm Apr 18 2006
Country:
Location: Boring, Oregon

Post by firffighter »

Yeah, I have not seen very many used here lately :wink:
'
User avatar
m0rie
Supporting Member I
Supporting Member I
Posts: 2220
Joined: 10:25 pm Nov 29 2004
Country:
Location: Crescent City, CA

Post by m0rie »

You'd be surprised how well they work in the slick and slimy. After my current rear tire wears out i'm going to switch to a trials tire. They hook up good and are real low impact vs knobbies as far as tearing up trail. Good things IMHO.
1989 KDX 200
2007 TTR-50E
User avatar
Mr. Wibbens
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 4884
Joined: 02:57 am Nov 07 2004
Country:
Location: Playing in the Poison Oak
Contact:

Post by Mr. Wibbens »

I doubt they'd work at Quartz Creek, unless it was dry
Warning! This member tends to use sarcasm as a regular form of communication. If a post seems offensive, before you panic and fly off the handle, re-read the post and imagine it being said with a sideways grin.
((Bike Profile))
((Pics))
FIVE OUT OF FOUR PEOPLE DONUT UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
firffighter
Supporting Member
Posts: 513
Joined: 03:39 pm Apr 18 2006
Country:
Location: Boring, Oregon

Post by firffighter »

Is the low end difference that great between a 200 and 220? Would a 200 with pipe, carb mod, opened air box, and reeds be able to make use of an autoclutch? With a FWW and trials tire It seems it would be hard to find anything a modded KDX 200 couldn't tackle.
'
User avatar
Indawoods
Creator and Founder
Creator and Founder
Posts: 9951
Joined: 09:59 am Jun 12 2003
Country:
Location: Midwest

Post by Indawoods »

A 200 is just as capable... especially after the 220 has the carb mod. The only difference between the two is the size of the carb... and a slight difference in porting.

I would take the 200 over the 220 any day....
*** Administrator //***
****'95 KDX 200/****

"People ate cows a thousand years ago for the same reason we eat them now. Cause they are easy to catch.We're not savages,we're just lazy. A cheetah could taste like chocolate heroin. But will never know. Those bastards are fast!!! "
User avatar
Mr. Wibbens
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 4884
Joined: 02:57 am Nov 07 2004
Country:
Location: Playing in the Poison Oak
Contact:

Post by Mr. Wibbens »

mE TOO

bUT THEN AGAIN i'D TAKE AN "e" SERIES OVER AN "h"
Warning! This member tends to use sarcasm as a regular form of communication. If a post seems offensive, before you panic and fly off the handle, re-read the post and imagine it being said with a sideways grin.
((Bike Profile))
((Pics))
FIVE OUT OF FOUR PEOPLE DONUT UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
firffighter
Supporting Member
Posts: 513
Joined: 03:39 pm Apr 18 2006
Country:
Location: Boring, Oregon

Post by firffighter »

What is the advantage of the E series? I know some think they have more umphh and I have heard the forks are better. Are these rumors true?
'
User avatar
Mr. Wibbens
KDXRider.net
KDXRider.net
Posts: 4884
Joined: 02:57 am Nov 07 2004
Country:
Location: Playing in the Poison Oak
Contact:

Post by Mr. Wibbens »

if you'd seen the places mine has taken my fat a$$ up you'd understand a lil better :lol:

Not many places Carvr can go that I can't follow, and I out weigh him by almost 100lbs :wink:
Warning! This member tends to use sarcasm as a regular form of communication. If a post seems offensive, before you panic and fly off the handle, re-read the post and imagine it being said with a sideways grin.
((Bike Profile))
((Pics))
FIVE OUT OF FOUR PEOPLE DONUT UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
IdahoCharley
Supporting Member II
Supporting Member II
Posts: 1005
Joined: 06:57 pm Mar 19 2005
Country:

Post by IdahoCharley »

Comments (.02 worth)- For tight technical riding steering stablizer seems like a waste of money to me. Getting rid of the underhang on the forks would be the primary performance advantage with the USD fork IMO for tight technical trails. I've only rode a 220 once but my thought is similar to Vince's - 200 or 220 differences likely not very much performance wise after standard mods have been performed. (i.e. buy what you get the better deal on). Trial tires do work better than many realize for many situations especially slow technical trails with wet rocks, roots, stream crossings - if the mud is the sticky variety they are worest than a good knobby.
KTM 380EXC Mine
KDX 200 Mark's
TTR 125 L Wife's
KDX 200 Austin's
EC 300 Tyson's
WR430 Husky - mine
User avatar
layoutd
Member
Posts: 167
Joined: 08:51 am Feb 25 2005
Country:
Location: Nooga, TN

Post by layoutd »

Don't want to be a pooper, but you can pick up an 04 KTM 200 for less than three and not have to do any modifications and will have a lighter, stronger, faster bike.

I have a fondness for my old KDX, but I'll never go back.
Eatin' ain't Cheatin'
User avatar
thebleakness
Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 02:08 am Sep 17 2006
Country:
Location: flagstaff arizona

Post by thebleakness »

Oh God, how dare you mention such an idea around here?! :roll:











:mrgreen:
firffighter
Supporting Member
Posts: 513
Joined: 03:39 pm Apr 18 2006
Country:
Location: Boring, Oregon

Post by firffighter »

I actually just sold my KTM200exc a couple of weeks ago. Here's the thing with the KTM, it does not have the chug factor the KDX does. I re-jetted, adjusted the power valve, re-geared, and even put a FWW on the KTM, and it still doesn't have the ability to chug at low speeds like the KDX does. The rest of the bike was very nice though. I need to be able to putt behind my kids with a 2 stroke and the KDX seems like the only bike that can handle the dad duties and still do well in more aggressive riding situations. Most of the riding I do is slow and technical and the KDX seems like it was custom made for this and yet it still has plenty when you want to open it up a little bit.

Sounds like a 200 vs. 220 when modded are fairly equal and for slow technical stuff the steering stabilizer and USD's aren't really necessary.
'
Post Reply