Page 1 of 1

fredette engine / RB

Posted: 10:52 pm Sep 29 2006
by scheckaet
Is it possible to run a fredette porting with head mod from RB and his airstriker? :blink:
What would be the advantage / disadvantage to run this combo (if it's even possible)?

Posted: 11:08 pm Sep 29 2006
by Indawoods
It's compatable... I just don't think there is any advantage to porting the KDX....

Posted: 09:45 am Sep 30 2006
by Mr. Wibbens
"Paging 'Carver to the white courtesy phone" :rolleyes:

Posted: 03:39 pm Sep 30 2006
by carlito
frp did my cylinder porting and you can feel a signifigant increase in power on my 220r.my riding style had to change because i was getting wheel spin everywhere.

Posted: 04:52 pm Sep 30 2006
by m0rie
>|<>QBB<
carlito wrote:frp did my cylinder porting and you can feel a signifigant increase in power on my 220r.my riding style had to change because i was getting wheel spin everywhere.
That wouldn't suprise me. The 220 porting is pretty tame stock.

Re: fredette engine / RB

Posted: 11:28 am Oct 02 2006
by canyncarvr
>|<>QBB<
scheckaet wrote:Is it possible to run a fredette porting with head mod from RB and his airstriker? :blink:
What would be the advantage / disadvantage to run this combo (if it's even possible)?
Yes, it is possible.

The advantage (if yours works) is your bike will run better.

Why would it not be possilbe?

Anecdotal input is not always useful, but.....my cylinder was ported by FRP and replated by USChrome. The cylinder was finished out of round. The engine with that topend never worked as it should have, indeed...a 'new' OEM ported cylinder runs considerably better than the ported cylinder ever did. That's not (probably) a problem with porting, but most likely a problem with USChrome.

...and not the first, only, nor the last problem you can read about on this forum regarding USChrome.

Not my idea, nor opine ('cuz I don't have a 220) but refining the porting on a 220 is by documentation, effect, and result a pretty simple thing to do. Why? Because 220 porting is such a goober in the first place.

It's (probably) easier to turn a 'muscle' car into a 13 second 1/4 miler from a 14 second car.

It's a lot harder to turn it into an 11 second car from a 12 second car!

That's a metaphor that applies, except it's really a simile, but I didn't say, like, yanno?

Posted: 07:54 pm Oct 03 2006
by carlito
canyncarvr wrote:>|<>QBB<
scheckaet wrote:Is it possible to run a fredette porting with head mod from RB and his airstriker? :blink:
What would be the advantage / disadvantage to run this combo (if it's even possible)?
Yes, it is possible.

The advantage (if yours works) is your bike will run better.

Why would it not be possilbe?

Anecdotal input is not always useful, but.....my cylinder was ported by FRP and replated by USChrome. The cylinder was finished out of round. The engine with that topend never worked as it should have, indeed...a 'new' OEM ported cylinder runs considerably better than the ported cylinder ever did. That's not (probably) a problem with porting, but most likely a problem with USChrome.

...and not the first, only, nor the last problem you can read about on this forum regarding USChrome.

Not my idea, nor opine ('cuz I don't have a 220) but refining the porting on a 220 is by documentation, effect, and result a pretty simple thing to do. Why? Because 220 porting is such a goober in the first place.

It's (probably) easier to turn a 'muscle' car into a 13 second 1/4 miler from a 14 second car.

It's a lot harder to turn it into an 11 second car from a 12 second car!

That's a metaphor that applies, except it's really a simile, but I didn't say, like, yanno?
if your going to use a muscle analogy, it would be proper to say that a kdx 200 is like an 18second car with a stock cylinder.