KDX200 with xr springs

Got questions? We got answers....
Post Reply
User avatar
motofox2006
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 07:21 pm Aug 13 2006
Country:

KDX200 with xr springs

Post by motofox2006 »

I have a 1991 kdx200

i want to change the spring stiifer i can go with
xr400 0.38kg springs 520mm length
or modern 95-05 kdx200 0.35 kg springs 470mm length

just wonder if i go with the xr springs because they are 520mm long instead of the kdx 470mm long spring when the xr springs compress will i end up with coil bind has anyone here had any problems like this.
E series 91 KDX
User avatar
bradf
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 703
Joined: 02:17 am Dec 11 2004
Country: USA
Location: Anderson, SC

Post by bradf »

You will need to make another spacer for the XR springs. Sched 40 PVC works great. Allow for about 15mm pre-load.
'04 220 w/'01 KX250 USD forks, '02 RM125 Showa shock, Rekluse EXP 3.0, LHRB & all RB'd
User avatar
motofox2006
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 07:21 pm Aug 13 2006
Country:

Post by motofox2006 »

So if I make another spacer for the XR springs and allow for about 15mm pre-load.
They will work find without them getting coil bind because their longer. Thanx guys
E series 91 KDX
User avatar
KanuckKDX
Member
Posts: 166
Joined: 08:35 pm May 28 2005
Country:
Location: Alberta Canada eh

Post by KanuckKDX »

The 15 mm of spacer really just fills the space and provides very little preload. Of course you can adjust preload until you get the right feel but when I preloaded the springs it was brutal and I couldn't ride the thing. The XR springs are shorter than stock KDX springs a far as I know.
KanuckKDX
'01 YZ426F son's
'02 XR400 still for sale
'04 KTM 450exc it's all about the e-start
User avatar
Indawoods
Creator and Founder
Creator and Founder
Posts: 9951
Joined: 09:59 am Jun 12 2003
Country:
Location: Midwest

Post by Indawoods »

It is my understanding that the springs are longer and require much less spacer. This is one of the reasons that they are more desireable over just heavier springs designed for replacement in the KDX.

This should make them plusher and stiffer at the same time. More stroke area before bind.
*** Administrator //***
****'95 KDX 200/****

"People ate cows a thousand years ago for the same reason we eat them now. Cause they are easy to catch.We're not savages,we're just lazy. A cheetah could taste like chocolate heroin. But will never know. Those bastards are fast!!! "
User avatar
Colorado Mike
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1921
Joined: 11:42 am Feb 25 2005
Country:
Location: Colorado

Post by Colorado Mike »

My XR springs were much longer than the KDX springs. This allowed me to remove the gitanic metal preload spacer Kawaski puts in, and run a smaller one I made from PVC. The forks worked loads better with the stiffer springs. A lot less nose dive on down hills while braking, handled whoops a lot better too. Still, putting KX forks on was a much bigger difference.
Mike

Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid.
'04 KDX220
User avatar
bradf
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 703
Joined: 02:17 am Dec 11 2004
Country: USA
Location: Anderson, SC

Post by bradf »

I did the XR springs, and like Colorado Mike says, it was better, but nowhere near as good as the KX fork set-up
'04 220 w/'01 KX250 USD forks, '02 RM125 Showa shock, Rekluse EXP 3.0, LHRB & all RB'd
User avatar
motofox2006
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 07:21 pm Aug 13 2006
Country:

Post by motofox2006 »

Sounds good ill probably go with the XR springs.

Id like to go with the kx front end but it is to much money for me to spend as im 15 years old. I priced it over here in new zealand and the kx front end was gonna cost me $500 (around $300 US)
E series 91 KDX
Post Reply