Help choosing!!
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03:40 pm Oct 13 2015
- Country:
Help choosing!!
Hi All! New member here, making a return to dirt after a 20yr absence. I'm picking up a KDX 200 this weekend and I've narrowed it down to 2 bikes....problem is, they're both fine examples. I suppose I need a push in one direction or another. The first I'm considering is a *MINT* 2002 with a host of tasteful aftermarket goodies. Clean doesn't begin to describe this bike. It has only about 55hrs on the original motor. The other is a 2005 w/2001 USD KX fork conversion. It too is in great shape, with many upgrades, but it has been used as a woods race bike for the past few years. It's motor has been rebuilt top to bottom with no expense spared this past winter, with only about 20hrs on it since.
Both bikes are the same price, so that isn't a deciding factor. I have a feeling that if I buy the 2002, I'll end up doing a fork conversion sooner or later so I'm leaning a bit towards the 2005. BUT I love the condition of the 2002, it's as new as you can get.
Help me out!! Which would you choose and why??
Thanks!
2002
2005
Both bikes are the same price, so that isn't a deciding factor. I have a feeling that if I buy the 2002, I'll end up doing a fork conversion sooner or later so I'm leaning a bit towards the 2005. BUT I love the condition of the 2002, it's as new as you can get.
Help me out!! Which would you choose and why??
Thanks!
2002
2005
-
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 674
- Joined: 07:54 am Jun 26 2012
- Country:
- Location: Rhode Island
Re: Help choosing!!
If it was me, I would go with the 2005 since it already has the fork conversion. If the motor has only 20hr SMOH, that also is a plus. I am sure others will chime in with their thoughts. Ultimately, it really comes down to your choice.
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
- Slick_Nick
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: 10:06 pm Oct 22 2009
- Country: Canada
- Location: Calgary, Alberta
- Contact:
Re: Help choosing!!
2002. Silver framed KDX's are lame!
The USD forks are nice, but who knows if they're sprung and valves for your riding style? You may end up investing even more than it would cost to put USD's on the '02.
The USD forks are nice, but who knows if they're sprung and valves for your riding style? You may end up investing even more than it would cost to put USD's on the '02.
'00 KDX 220R
- G22inSC
- Supporting Member I
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 10:23 pm Jul 24 2006
- Country: United States
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Help choosing!!
I have an '05 with KX forks and I say go for the 2002. If you want to swap forks later, it's not tough and a good learning experience. Besides, that KX green frame is just plain sexy!
'05 Kaw KDX200 ('00 KX125 forks / '02 RM125 Showa "K2" shock)
'14 Yam YZ125(x) (oldest boy's)
'22 Yam YZ125X (youngest boy's)
'17 Yam YZ85 (soon to be FOR SALE)
'10 Honda Recon (wife's)
'08 Kaw KX65 (Sold)
'07 KTM 50SX Sr. (Sold)
'09 Yam PW50 (retired)
'97 Kaw KX250 (Sold)
Gallery
2005 KDX200 Bike Profile
'14 Yam YZ125(x) (oldest boy's)
'22 Yam YZ125X (youngest boy's)
'17 Yam YZ85 (soon to be FOR SALE)
'10 Honda Recon (wife's)
'08 Kaw KX65 (Sold)
'07 KTM 50SX Sr. (Sold)
'09 Yam PW50 (retired)
'97 Kaw KX250 (Sold)
Gallery
2005 KDX200 Bike Profile
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Re: Help choosing!!
Don't wait too long- you might not have a choice.
- Jaguar
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 590
- Joined: 01:32 am Jul 03 2013
- Country: Paraguay
- Location: Paraguay
- Contact:
Re: Help choosing!!
the 2002 because you probably got fat and lazy during your 20 years off bikes. ha! but seriously.
the 2005 is setup for a fast rider that races.
the 2005 is setup for a fast rider that races.
Performance CDI -- KDX motocross mods -- the SR KDX -- expansion chamber analysis---> http://www.dragonfly75.com/moto/
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03:40 pm Oct 13 2015
- Country:
Re: Help choosing!!
LOL!! I've been road racing most recently, so this would be a way to scratch the itch during the off season!Jaguar wrote:the 2002 because you probably got fat and lazy during your 20 years off bikes. ha! but seriously.
the 2005 is setup for a fast rider that races.
I appreciate the input guys. I'm going to look at both of them this weekend and one is going to be in my truck on the way home.
I'll report back with pictures.
- SS109
- KDXRider.net
- Posts: 5784
- Joined: 05:11 am Aug 23 2009
- Country: USA
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
- Contact:
Help choosing!!
The '05 hands down. Less hours and already has the KX forks. Setting up the suspension for it will be way cheaper than doing a conversion later and still having to set it up. Plus, frames can be painted!
Youtube Channel: WildAzzRacing
AZ State Parks & Trails OHV Ambassador - Trail Riders of Southern AZ
Current KDX: '98 KDX220
Old KDX: '90 KDX200 -White/Blue
'11 GasGas EC250R
AZ State Parks & Trails OHV Ambassador - Trail Riders of Southern AZ
Current KDX: '98 KDX220
Old KDX: '90 KDX200 -White/Blue
'11 GasGas EC250R
- Julien D
- KDXRider.net
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: 07:53 pm Nov 07 2008
- Country: USA
- Contact:
Re: Help choosing!!
My vote would be for the 05 as well. I actually prefer the silver frame and black tank, and I'd rather 20 hours on an engine rebuilt by a knowledgeable person to 55 hours on a bone stock engine. The fork swap is also a huge plus, IMO.
When you go to look at them, try to check out condition of linkage/wheel bearings etc. on both bikes. If you can possibly get a quick ride on each of them back to back, that will most likely be the deciding factor for you.
When you go to look at them, try to check out condition of linkage/wheel bearings etc. on both bikes. If you can possibly get a quick ride on each of them back to back, that will most likely be the deciding factor for you.
- K50X200
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 151
- Joined: 09:40 pm Jan 29 2013
- Country:
- Location: Palmyra, PA
Re: Help choosing!!
'05...
"00 KDX200 - Baja Designs D/S Kit, '03 KLX300 Forks, KB5 Suspension Mods, Keihn 35 ASQV, Boyesen Rad Valve, Gnarly Woods Pipe
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03:40 pm Oct 13 2015
- Country:
Re: Help choosing!!
Good point about the bearings, thanks.Julien D wrote:My vote would be for the 05 as well. I actually prefer the silver frame and black tank, and I'd rather 20 hours on an engine rebuilt by a knowledgeable person to 55 hours on a bone stock engine. The fork swap is also a huge plus, IMO.
When you go to look at them, try to check out condition of linkage/wheel bearings etc. on both bikes. If you can possibly get a quick ride on each of them back to back, that will most likely be the deciding factor for you.
-
- Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 09:05 pm Sep 07 2010
- Country:
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Help choosing!!
Id go with the '05
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Re: Help choosing!!
If you start leaning towards the '05, make sure to ask some specifics about the fork conversion. Like who did the work (RB, local machine shop, etc), were they lowered internally or are they stock and raised in the clamps, were they revalved or resprung?
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03:40 pm Oct 13 2015
- Country:
Re: Help choosing!!
He had a shop press the stem in, but he did the swap himself. No internal work so they were raised up in the triples a bit. Is there a difference in performance between internal shortening vs. raising?Tedh98 wrote:If you start leaning towards the '05, make sure to ask some specifics about the fork conversion. Like who did the work (RB, local machine shop, etc), were they lowered internally or are they stock and raised in the clamps, were they revalved or resprung?
- B737driver
- Gold Member
- Posts: 491
- Joined: 01:11 pm Dec 02 2011
- Country:
- Location: Heath, Texas
Re: Help choosing!!
Trickyrick wrote:He had a shop press the stem in, but he did the swap himself. No internal work so they were raised up in the triples a bit. Is there a difference in performance between internal shortening vs. raising?Tedh98 wrote:If you start leaning towards the '05, make sure to ask some specifics about the fork conversion. Like who did the work (RB, local machine shop, etc), were they lowered internally or are they stock and raised in the clamps, were they revalved or resprung?
Mine are lowered internally. You do lose a slight bit of "range" of fork travel. For me, 20 years I needed the extra travel. Now, not so much.
Another vote for the '05.
Live to Fly
Fly to Live
Fly to Live
- 6 Riders
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: 12:58 pm May 01 2013
- Country: USA
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: Help choosing!!
Yes, but if you have forks that have 11" of travel and take one inch out, you will then have forks with the same amount of travel as the KDX ....10". So not a bad thing to have them lowered, just don't over do it.B737driver wrote:Trickyrick wrote:He had a shop press the stem in, but he did the swap himself. No internal work so they were raised up in the triples a bit. Is there a difference in performance between internal shortening vs. raising?Tedh98 wrote:If you start leaning towards the '05, make sure to ask some specifics about the fork conversion. Like who did the work (RB, local machine shop, etc), were they lowered internally or are they stock and raised in the clamps, were they revalved or resprung?
Mine are lowered internally. You do lose a slight bit of "range" of fork travel. For me, 20 years I needed the extra travel. Now, not so much.
Another vote for the '05.
newbbewb wrote:^what he said.
*side note...I'm drunk, so try to read what I'm trying to say, instead of what I actually typemasterblaster wrote:Man 6 riders you rock.
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03:40 pm Oct 13 2015
- Country:
Re: Help choosing!!
Well, both sellers sent me more detailed pictures of the bikes last night, and the 05 has definitely seen more use. There's a couple small tears on the seat, the plastics have considerably more scratches, and it generally looks more beat. That's not to say its clapped out, but it's been ridden. The 02 on the other hand, looks like you could eat off the thing, as close to showroom as I've ever seen. I'm an OCD nut when it comes to machines and mechanical things, so now I'm leaning towards the 02, LOL.
Eh well, first guy to drop a couple dollars from their "FIRM" price gets the sale! Otherwise I'll go get a KTM......
Now onto a related note: what's a good boot that won't break the bank???
Eh well, first guy to drop a couple dollars from their "FIRM" price gets the sale! Otherwise I'll go get a KTM......
Now onto a related note: what's a good boot that won't break the bank???
-
- Supporting Member III
- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 02:26 pm Jun 29 2005
- Country:
- Location: Alabama
Re: Help choosing!!
I'd go '05. You won't regret having those forks.
'08 KTM200xc
'99 CR/KDX Hybrid with that RB stuff done to it
KX100 for the boy
'99 CR/KDX Hybrid with that RB stuff done to it
KX100 for the boy
-
- Supporting Member I
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 07:35 pm Nov 06 2013
- Country:
Re: Help choosing!!
02 has my vote. I am OCD when it comes to engines and perfer one untouched. Good luck! Keep us posted.