Differences between '87 200 and '95 and up?

Got questions? We got answers....
Post Reply
kdxcruzer
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 03:02 pm Apr 20 2013
Country:

Differences between '87 200 and '95 and up?

Post by kdxcruzer »

We currently have a '87 kdx 200 and trail ride single track timber in the midwest. Really like the pull and light weight handling of the air cooled '87. We need another kdx so my 21 yr old son and I can ride together.
The question is: Do you gain much in performance and handling with a post, 1995 kdx liquid cooled version? Thoughts on differences? Thanks
User avatar
Gotanubike
Supporting Member III
Supporting Member III
Posts: 898
Joined: 01:00 pm May 22 2013
Country:
Location: Ontario, Can

Differences between '87 200 and '95 and up?

Post by Gotanubike »

H model 95-06's have the highest compression of all the KDX's. They do lack a bit of bottom end though apparently.

I made up a wikipedia article for the KDX last month. Have a look to compare model specifications

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawasaki_KDX200
1990 KDX200
Bike Profile -> http://www.kdxrider.net/forums/viewtopi ... 61#p136315
Suspension Overhaul(Shock+89-92 conventional forks) -> http://www.kdxrider.net/forums/viewtopi ... 15&t=15255
96'-98' RM125 Showa 49mm fork swap -> http://www.kdxrider.net/forums/viewtopi ... 04&t=16994
KDXrider world map! -> https://www.zeemaps.com/map?group=186158
newbbewb
Supporting Member II
Supporting Member II
Posts: 579
Joined: 12:20 am Jan 22 2012
Country:
Location: sw washington state

Re: Differences between '87 200 and '95 and up?

Post by newbbewb »

you get TONS of parts availability and an extremely reliable bike with the H series (years 95+). It's a goat, it'll do just about anything. it's not as light as your 87, and it'll need front fork springs right away. other than that, maybe jet is right, and just ride. you can't go wrong.
93 kdx200-Highly modified
89 kx125/kdx200E engine
Buelldustin@gmail.com
User avatar
Joshmcmillan
Supporting Member
Posts: 232
Joined: 09:02 am Aug 23 2013
Country:
Location: Australia

Re: Differences between '87 200 and '95 and up?

Post by Joshmcmillan »

H-series definitely has a slight lack in bottom end, but makes up for it everywhere else. I prefer it in the really tight stuff actually, it as the low-down torque to not-stall, barely require and clutch use and tractor up hill climbs, but I found my older KDX tries to lift the front wheel up hills and flip you off, where the H has a smoother power curve so it's a nice flat increment from low-torque into the top end power.
07' CR450X (Main Bike)
07' KX125 (Completed basket case rebuild, for sale)
88' KDX200 (Not sure yet, runs but with rattly top end)
91' CBR250RR
Old Bikes: 97' KDX200, 00' RM125, 85' XR350, 94' KDX200, 02' CR80, 82' XT250, 98' CT200
User avatar
bufftester
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 3455
Joined: 06:03 pm Oct 31 2012
Country: USA
Location: University Place, WA

Re: Differences between '87 200 and '95 and up?

Post by bufftester »

You gain all the improvements to handling that come with a perimeter frame, improved suspension lever ratios, improved fork internals (although not lots of improvement lol). Reliability is even better, parts availability is better, improved KIPS. From 95 on they didn't change so year is not as important as condition when shopping.
Post Reply