Page 1 of 2

crank seals

Posted: 10:56 am Mar 08 2012
by cornishwrecker220
Typical...rebuilt the top end 3 months ago & now the crank seals have just given up! Can they be extracted & new ones installed without having to split the cases? The bottom end/mains etc all seems fine but if the motor has to come out & split then it`s just aswell i rebuild the bottom end while everything`s apart, trouble is money is a little tight at the moment :cry:

Posted: 11:15 am Mar 08 2012
by Julien D
Cases must be split. If the seals are leaking, it is highly unlikely that the mains are still good anyway.

Posted: 11:32 am Mar 08 2012
by cornishwrecker220
I figured as much :cry: looks like i shall have to start saving my pennies... i haven`t ridden for almost a year due to injury but fired up the bike up every so often, i rebuilt the top end prior to my return, guess the crank seals went dry/hard in the meantime. thanks for quick reply.

Posted: 12:05 pm Mar 08 2012
by SS109
Why in the hell Kawasaki screwed the pooch on this one serious detail is beyond me.

Posted: 01:39 pm Mar 08 2012
by Julien D
I see it as a good thing. I'm of the opinion that one should never replace the seals without replacing the bearings. I figure that's what Kawi had in mind with the design.

Posted: 04:40 pm Mar 08 2012
by fuzzy
Indeed. I'd go further and do the lower rod bearing/rod while your in there. having the crank rebuilt also ensures good runout. Bad runout is well, bad, but will also trash a new seal quickly.

Posted: 07:09 pm Mar 08 2012
by SS109
I have seen plenty of bikes that have had their seals replaced and not needed crank bearings plus gave many more years of service. Hell, the seals on my 200 started leaking which is why I planned my rebuild. When I pulled it apart the crank bearings were still in excellent shape and the same with rod big end and all the bearings/bushings in the transmission. All it really needed was the crank seals. Yes, I bought all new everything but I sure could have saved a bunch and a lot of hassle if it was an easier to service design.

Posted: 07:55 pm Mar 08 2012
by JoKDX220r
no one ever moded a kdx to be able to get this seal out easily ?
like grinding the seal stopper and replacing it by a plate bolted somewhere in the crankcase ? (when the case is splitted)
Everytime I do thoses seals I wonder if it can work..

Posted: 09:19 pm Mar 08 2012
by Julien D
I have seen a thread some time ago where someone milled off the stops and tapped some holes for some removable stops to be attached so you could remove the seals from the outside. I have yet to see a leaking crank seal that didn't have a bearing with excessive play behind it. Seems silly to change the seals and not fix the cause of the problem. I'm not sure what qualifies as "plenty of bikes" or "years of service". Either way, I don't buy it.

Posted: 09:27 pm Mar 08 2012
by rbates9
I could see it being nice to be able to replace the seals mid season to get thru the rest before a off season tear down.

Posted: 09:40 pm Mar 08 2012
by Julien D
True, I guess. There is no mid-season here. I trail ride, and I ride all year.

Posted: 09:49 pm Mar 08 2012
by Fletch
>|<>QBB<
juliend wrote:True, I guess. There is no mid-season here. I trail ride, and I ride all year.
Yes you are a lucky bugger :evil: I'm almost in the inbetween season where there is no longer safe ice to ride and yet there is still too much snow.....

Posted: 05:10 am Mar 09 2012
by paulkdx220
>|<>QBB<
juliend wrote:I see it as a good thing. I'm of the opinion that one should never replace the seals without replacing the bearings. I figure that's what Kawi had in mind with the design.
:roll:

Posted: 07:05 am Mar 09 2012
by Julien D
Wow. So what are you trying to say there, Paul? Make sure you say it sevreral times, so we can all hear you.

Posted: 12:05 pm Mar 09 2012
by SS109
>|<>QBB<
juliend wrote:I have yet to see a leaking crank seal that didn't have a bearing with excessive play behind it. Seems silly to change the seals and not fix the cause of the problem. I'm not sure what qualifies as "plenty of bikes" or "years of service". Either way, I don't buy it.
So, you're calling me a liar? Really? Have I ever given reason to doubt my word? Please don't start acting like the A-holes over at DirtRider where you are the only one who is right and all others are idiots, please.

BTW, "Plenty of bikes means" more than three IMO. Also, "years" means more than one year.

Posted: 12:44 pm Mar 09 2012
by cornishwrecker220
took the flywheel cover off today & noticed a tiny bit of oil in the housing so i wiped it away then fired the bike up...she started ok & began to idle without any problem...i sprayed some carb cleaner in & around the flywheel & the rpm did not increase?? also i inspected the gearbox level & it dosent appear to have dropped (i will change it & inspect for fuel contamination) i will take the bike for a small ride then remove the flywheel cover & inspect again...could my seals have dried up a little while the bike was sat about,now after the bike is being used again they maybe on the way out or perhaps they may begin settle down again??

Posted: 03:06 pm Mar 09 2012
by Julien D
>|<>QBB<
SS109 wrote:>|<>QBB<
juliend wrote:I have yet to see a leaking crank seal that didn't have a bearing with excessive play behind it. Seems silly to change the seals and not fix the cause of the problem. I'm not sure what qualifies as "plenty of bikes" or "years of service". Either way, I don't buy it.
So, you're calling me a liar? Really? Have I ever given reason to doubt my word? Please don't start acting like the A-holes over at dirtflamer where you are the only one who is right and all others are idiots, please.

BTW, "Plenty of bikes means" more than three IMO. Also, "years" means more than one year.
Not at all man. I'm just stating my experience, nothing more nothing less. If you've had better experience with main bearings than me, that's great. I honestly think it's a VERY good idea to change the main bearings any time you are replacing the seals, that's all.

Posted: 05:55 pm Mar 09 2012
by SS109
OK, I'm glad what I read is not what I read it to be. Don't scare me like that!

Posted: 08:22 pm Mar 13 2012
by paulkdx220
jullend, didn't mean anything nasty with my rollie eyes emoticon

i just meant that it's convenient to be able to change just seals if you wanted.
it would suck if you only had a bad seal and you end up having to do a bottom end job.

:partyman:

Posted: 05:59 am Mar 14 2012
by Julien D
Understood. And all I meant is that it is highly unlikely that you are ever going to have only a seal bad.